|
Dear
!*FIRST_NAME*!
Here
is the latest edition of HRD Alert! to which you subscribed.
If you have trouble reading this or prefer to read an online copy,
you'll find one here.
You can load it into your browser or save and read it off line.
EDITORIAL
Wow, what a month
... and it's mid-year already. I
can't believe our lives are passing so fast.
On a really quiet day I'm sure I can hear
my grandson growing; sinews stretching, bones growing, muscles
toning, hair strengthening and so on. Amid all the excitement,
one has to find time for continuing self development, earning
a buck, maintaining one's key relationships, and doing the many
other chores that befall us. As well as having some fun!
Recently a colleague
gave me a small book titled Selfscape: Success through Balance
by Sheryle Moon because, 'I know you're into this type of stuff'.
I wasn't sure whether he was inferring that I'm a bit eccentric,
but I read the book and found it very interesting. And yes, it
was about the type of stuff in which I'm interested. It's
all about having a vision for your life and planning to make the
vision come true rather than let your life 'accidentally' unfold.
I've provided details in Worth a Look and recommend you read this
book and plan your life. In fact, I've decided to provide a
free copy to some lucky person:
|
Win
a Great Book Worth $25AU!
Here's an opportunity too good to miss. You could win
a copy of
Selfscape: Success Through Balance
by Sheryle Moon. It has 120 pp and a recommended retail
price of $25 AUD. All you need do is email me
here with your name and answer this question:
How
many infoproducts does Sitesell.com sell?
(Hint: the answer can be found here
)
A winner will be randomly selected on 31
July 04 and
I will advise all entrants of the result shortly thereafter.
Only ONE entry from each email address will be accepted,
but entries will be accepted from anyone, anywhere. Tell
your friends, relatives and colleagues - just copy the
text below and paste it into your email client. Add your
friends name and sign off and bingo, it's done.
<---Cut text below here--->
Dear
There's
a great competition being held in which you can win a
book that will help you attain your life's vision. All
you need do is answer a question and email your answer
to enter.
Click
on this link for more information or cut and paste it
into your browser.
|
The
two articles this issue are about the new nomenclature for training
and development and how to make your sessions more interesting.
If there are any specific topics you'd like me to address, please
let me know.
I
hope you and yours are well.
Until next edition,
yours
in HRD
Robin
Henry
Principal Adviser/Publisher
CONTENTS IN BRIEF
The Transition
to Human Performance Improvement
We've had training managers, learning managers, learning officers,
people development, staff development and a host of other names
for the function within organisations that caters for staffs'
education, learning or development (or whatever you prefer to
call it!). The latest term is Strategic Human Performance Improvement
Manager. Read all about it in this issue.
From Boring to Interesting?
How
many times have you sat in a room and been 'trained' by someone
who shows a fist full of overhead projection slides and talks
at you? You spend your time wondering whether it could have been
done better. Or you start thinking of something totally unrelated.
This short article suggests some things you can do to make your
next 'chalk and talk' interesting.
Worth a Look
There are three sites
and a book referenced in this issue. A new site run by the Learning
Economics Group, a skills report from Australia's National Training
Authority and a US Small Business site with articles suitable
for anyone.
[TOP]
THE TRANSITION TO HUMAN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
With the new, trendy
title of Strategic Human Performance Improvement Manager, many
people will now be beavering away to do what I thought training
was expected to do all along ... help improve individual performance
so that organisational performance would improve. A cascading
effect.
As a younger fellow
I worked on what was then called Organisation and Methods Analysis
in the Queensland Police Force. The aim was to analyse organisation
and methods and make improvements where necessary. And believe
me, there was a lot of 'necessary' if the Force was to make the
transition into the 20th Century.
One of the first
jobs I had was to write an administrative instruction advising
the troops how much forage a horse needed to survive. It had become
necessary because the QPD had incurred a hefty bill to keep a
'found' horse in forage until its owner could be located. I didn't
have the heart to tell my senior sergeant that I didn't know what
the hell 'forage' was (I grew up on mines, not stations), but
armed with the certain knowledge that it was obviously something
edible that horses loved, I trudged off to the Veterinary Faculty
at the Queensland University. Before long I had solved the mystery
about nomenclature, learnt why horses need forage (if not only
to stay alive), and received expert advice about the daily quantity
required to keep such a beast alive. My subsequent administrative
edict was proudly distributed to every Police Station in Queensland
under the hand of Commissioner Terry Lewis (who was later sentenced
to a lengthy stretch in goal for corruption). Not to worry, the
Police Department would never again over feed a horse in custody
(or is it captivity?).
Jokes aside, performance
improvement in organisations - even the QPD - has been on agenda
for probably hundreds, if not thousands of years. What I think
has been happening slowly, is that we are getting closer and closer
to the cutting edge of organisational outcomes. Rather than asking
what training someone needs to improve performance and hoping
that post-training it will all lead to higher productivity or
improved quality outcomes, we are now finding out what is happening
at the outcomes end and working back to see how it can be improved.
And isn't it about time?
For years now I have
envisaged a Performance Enhancement Department that combines human
resources and development practitioners, quality professionals,
technical writers, and auditors. The auditors and quality people
find the problems, the HRD people design solutions in collaboration
with the others and deliver training. The technical writers create
procedures and documentation to promulgate the revised or new
processes. That way, there is a more synergistic, holistic approach
to identifying and rectifying organisational shortcomings.
Unfortunately, everywhere
I have worked the audit, training, and quality people have worked
separately. Most have never had technical writers, they've used
what I unkindly call 'gifted amateurs'. This often leads to mediocre
procedures that are poorly written and often difficult for users
to understand - which leads to errors, shortcutting and general
inefficiency.
The new Strategic
HPI approach takes HRD a step further. An HPI consultant works
with managers to analyse a business and its goals, determine the
relationship between goals and human performance, analyses performance
and the causes of underperformance (if any), and then devises
interventions to address causes. Results are evaluated and hopefully,
the underperformance disappears forever.
Whatever we call
it, the role of training has always been to improve individuals'
skills so that they could do better work for their employers.
I can't see that changing any time real soon.
[TOP]
FROM BORING TO INTERESTING?
Being
a good trainer requires experience and skill. Experience comes
from practice and skill from learning the theories, applying them,
getting feedback and consciously improving.
Some
things that will help you improve are:
- Know
your target audience - what's in it for them? What do they expect?
Why are they attending your training?
- Sometimes
go back to basics - it's a good chance to reevaluate your performance
- Find
ways to generate interaction and get your participants doing
something
- Provide
as much variety as practicable
- Demonstrate
where possible - it will save many words
- Use
humour wherever possible. If associated with analogies, this
can help participants recall specifics
- Consider
your training as a marketing exercise
When
you prepare your session (you DO prepare don't you?) think of
it in terms of you having to make a sale. I know this sounds odd,
but when you think about it, you are trying to 'sell' someone
the ideas you are putting across. So there's much we can learn
from the art of salesmanship or marketing.
Think
along the lines of the acronym A - I - D - A which stands for
Attention - Interest - Desire - Action. Get attention by making
a statement that is bold or give an example of what could happen
if they don't do what it is you are about to suggest. For example,
if you were about to deliver a road safety talk, you could start
off by saying something like, '560 people died on Queensland Roads
last year ... what's going to keep you from adding to that statistic?'
You may then give them some 'Interesting' statistics about how
many of those people were drivers who committed traffic offences.
Desire is aroused when we want something - in this case, the solution
to NOT becoming a statistic. Then, the Action part might relate
to a commitment from them to put into effect what you have taught
them.
The
best scenario I have found is to present a problem or predicament,
state how the problem can be solved or the predicament can be
avoided, present a preferred option and then ask for the action
(buying, adopting etc depending on circumstances).
When
planning your session, think about how you can weave AIDA into:
Explain, Demonstrate, Question, Practise, Review. It won't be
appropriate to every session, but if it can be used, it's a sound
option. And remember, if you have a large volume of content, you
may need to break it (it's called chunking) into separate chunks
each of which has an E-D-Q-P-R. Questioning is two-way. You need
to question your participants to find out if they understand what
you have delivered; they need an opportunity to clear up any doubts
they have by questioning you. Your review can be a summary (which
also includes Q) or it can be a review at the commencement of
a later presentation about a continuing topic.
When
next you are about to prepare a 'chalk and talk' session or perhaps
a 'show and tell', think about how you could make it a little
more interesting and interactive by using AIDA and EDQPR strategies.
You'll be pleasantly surprised at what good ideas you come up
with. And it will show in your session evaluation.
[TOP]
Learning Economics Group
The Learning
Economics Group (LEG) has a developing site that promises to be
the source of excellent information for those interested in the
strategic value of learning - how learning adds value to organisations.
The advisory council for the LEG has an impressive group with
at least five PhDs. More
...
ANTA'S Second National Industry Skills Report
This report
puts a "skilling lens" across the issues that Australia
faces in the future. The report was released in April 2004 at
the second national industry skills forum in Sydney where leaders
from business and employment met with vocational education and
training (VET) decision-makers to discuss the workforce skills
base required for internationally competitive companies and enterprises.
This will be of more interest to Australian readers, but will
also be of interest to overseas readers since trends tend to be
international.
You can download
a copy of the report free, but are first required to give your
email address and type of industry. More
...
United States Small Business Administration
At this
site you'll find a huge list of self-paced courses or workshops
you can access that will help your training business. I clicked
on the Identify Your Target Market option and after completing
a diversity questionnaire (so they could get to know me better),
I was redirected to the Bank of America. There I found an audio-visual,
computer-based-training screen where I worked through the topic.
While not every topic will be relevant to everyone, there are
more than sufficient to choose from and many of the topics are
universal, not US-centric.. More
...
[TOP]
|